mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: "Ortwin Glück" <odi@odi.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm: is pmtu broken with ESP tunneling?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:01:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213000115.GH11150@order.stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FA8618.5030509@odi.ch>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:20:40PM +0100, Ortwin Glück wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 03:32 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >>net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc=1.
> >
> >This setting will shrink the path mtu to min_pmtu when a frag needed icmp 
> >is
> >received.
> 
> The UDP+ESP encapsulation adds 60 bytes to the original packet size.
> 
> ifconfig wla0 shows an mtu of 1500.
> 
> The size of the first big packet on the interface:
> net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc=1: packet length is 1300
> net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc=0: packet length is 1500
> 
> Length is without the ESP wrapper and UDP encapsulation. The packets are so 
> big that they can't even leave the wireless interface and never show up on 
> the router. So no ICMP packets are received. PMTU can't work with initial 
> packets of that size.
> 
> dump question: which layer discard these packets? qdisc? why no 
> notification to the sender?

Could you try either dropwatch or perf script net_dropmonitor and flood the
network with the problematic packets. From the traces we could see where the
packets get dropped without notification in the kernel.

> When I increase the mtu of the interface to 2000 with ifconfig, then I 
> start seeing ICMP fragmentation needed from the next hop, indicating 1500 
> as the mtu as response to a 1560 byte UDP[ESP] packet.
> 
> The next UDP[ESP] packet is shorter: 1360 bytes. It gets hard to see what's 
> going on after that, but the connection is still not working.
> 
> So, instead of somehow losing these packets on the way out of the interface 
> should the kernel not start with a lower mtu in the first place? Now it 
> seems it is trying with the maximum of the interface and expecting to scale 
> down with pmtu - which can ever happen.
> 
> >Can you send a ip route get <ip> to the problematic target to see how
> >far off the calculated value is?
> 
> That command doesn't return anything useful. No hint on the mtu here.
> 
> BTW, instead of disabling pmtu, setting mtu explicitly also helps:
> ip route add 10.6.6.0/24 via ${localip} mtu 1300

Strange that the problem disappears if you enable no_pmtu_disc then.

Thanks,

  Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-13  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-10  8:41 Ortwin Glück
2014-02-11  2:32 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-02-11 20:20   ` Ortwin Glück
2014-02-13  0:01     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-02-13 19:53       ` Ortwin Glück

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140213000115.GH11150@order.stressinduktion.org \
    --to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odi@odi.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®