From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752397AbaBNNRJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:17:09 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:41655 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751584AbaBNNRG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:17:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:17:05 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Nicholas Mc Guire Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Carsten Emde , Thomas Gleixner , Andreas Platschek Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/5] allow preemption in mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat Message-ID: <20140214131705.GF28438@linutronix.de> References: <20140210153933.GE20017@opentech.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20140210153933.GE20017@opentech.at> X-Key-Id: 97C4700B X-Key-Fingerprint: 09E2 D1F3 9A3A FF13 C3D3 961C 0688 1C1E 97C4 700B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nicholas Mc Guire | 2014-02-10 16:39:33 [+0100]: >index a67e630f..e7cc35a 100644 >--- a/mm/memcontrol.c >+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c >@@ -3784,10 +3784,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *from, > enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx) > { > /* Update stat data for mem_cgroup */ >- preempt_disable(); >+ migrate_disable(); > __this_cpu_sub(from->stat->count[idx], nr_pages); > __this_cpu_add(to->stat->count[idx], nr_pages); >- preempt_enable(); >+ migrate_enable(); > } Now, that I look at it again. Isn't it more efficient to keep preemption disabled for this very short time instead instead of invoking migrate_disable() which includes preempt_disable()/enable() and a few more opcodes… Therefore, I drop it again. Sebastian