mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ring-buffer: Fix first commit on sub-buffer having non-zero delta
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 08:20:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140215132214.688909341@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140215132057.012974140@goodmis.org>

[-- Attachment #1: 0001-ring-buffer-Fix-first-commit-on-sub-buffer-having-no.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1597 bytes --]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Each sub-buffer (buffer page) has a full 64 bit timestamp. The events on
that page use a 27 bit delta against that timestamp in order to save on
bits written to the ring buffer. If the time between events is larger than
what the 27 bits can hold, a "time extend" event is added to hold the
entire 64 bit timestamp again and the events after that hold a delta from
that timestamp.

As a "time extend" is always paired with an event, it is logical to just
allocate the event with the time extend, to make things a bit more efficient.

Unfortunately, when the pairing code was written, it removed the "delta = 0"
from the first commit on a page, causing the events on the page to be
slightly skewed.

Fixes: 69d1b839f7ee "ring-buffer: Bind time extend and data events together"
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.37+
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 294b8a2..fc4da2d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2397,6 +2397,13 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 	write &= RB_WRITE_MASK;
 	tail = write - length;
 
+	/*
+	 * If this is the first commit on the page, then it has the same
+	 * timestamp as the page itself.
+	 */
+	if (!tail)
+		delta = 0;
+
 	/* See if we shot pass the end of this buffer page */
 	if (unlikely(write > BUF_PAGE_SIZE))
 		return rb_move_tail(cpu_buffer, length, tail,
-- 
1.8.4.3



  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-15 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-15 13:20 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: Two urgent fixes Steven Rostedt
2014-02-15 13:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-02-15 13:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ftrace/x86: Use breakpoints for converting function graph caller Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140215132214.688909341@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome