From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Update total bandwidth when adding new task
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:56:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140218215659.2a3ddd8f@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
While debugging the crash with the bad nr_running accounting, I hit
another bug where, after running my sched deadline test, I was getting
failures to take a CPU offline. It was giving me a -EBUSY error.
Adding a bunch of trace_printk()s around, I found that the cpu
notifier that called sched_cpu_inactive() was returning a failure. The
overflow value was coming up negative?
Adding more trace_printk()s, I found that task_dead_dl() function was
subtracting the exact amount that was keeping the CPU from going
offline. I then realized that the task_dead_dl() was updating the
total_bw for the task that was going away, but there was nothing that
added to the total_bw when the task came alive. If total_bw is not
zero for a CPU, it will keep that CPU from going offline.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b46131e..17f4830 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3178,6 +3178,7 @@ static void
__setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
{
struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p));
init_dl_task_timer(dl_se);
dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
@@ -3187,6 +3188,7 @@ __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
dl_se->dl_new = 1;
+ __dl_add(dl_b, dl_se->dl_bw);
}
/* Actually do priority change: must hold pi & rq lock. */
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 2:56 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-02-19 10:07 ` Juri Lelli
2014-02-19 18:53 ` [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix overflow to handle period==0 and deadline!=0 Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 7:47 ` Juri Lelli
2014-02-21 20:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/deadline: Fix overflow to handle period= =0 " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140218215659.2a3ddd8f@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®