From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant map definitions
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:13:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220101311.GA24574@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53050BF5.1060009@citrix.com>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:54:29PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >>On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >>>>This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
> >>>
> >>>Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? That's a
> >>>slightly odd way to structure a series. They don't seem to be "generic
> >>>helpers" or anything so it would be more normal to introduce these as
> >>>they get used -- it's a bit hard to review them out of context.
> >>I've created two patches because they are quite huge even now,
> >>separately. Together they would be a ~500 line change. That was the best
> >>I could figure out keeping in mind that bisect should work. But as I
> >>wrote in the first email, I welcome other suggestions. If you and Wei
> >>prefer this two patch in one big one, I merge them in the next version.
> >
> >I suppose it is hard to split a change like this up in a sensible way,
> >but it is rather hard to review something which is split in two parts
> >sensibly.
> >
> >If the combined patch too large to fit on the lists?
> Well, it's ca. 30 kb, ~500 lines changed. I guess it's possible.
> It's up to you and Wei, if you would like them to be merged, I can
> do that.
>
As I said before, my bottom line is "don't break bisection". Do whatever
you want to. :-)
Wei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 21:24 [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant map definitions Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-18 17:06 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-18 20:36 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-19 10:05 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-19 19:54 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-20 9:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-21 1:19 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-24 11:13 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-20 10:13 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2014-02-18 17:24 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-19 19:19 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/9] xen-netback: Change TX path from grant copy to mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-18 17:40 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-18 18:46 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-02-19 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-19 12:27 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-22 22:33 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-24 16:56 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/9] xen-netback: Change RX path for mapped SKB fragments Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-18 17:45 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-22 23:18 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-24 13:49 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-24 15:08 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-27 12:43 ` Wei Liu
2014-02-27 15:49 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-27 16:01 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 7/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for frag_list skbs Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 22:03 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-20 22:12 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-21 0:24 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-23 1:50 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy David Miller
2014-01-23 13:13 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-23 21:39 ` David Miller
2014-01-23 21:49 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-02-19 9:50 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-24 15:31 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140220101311.GA24574@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome