From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753981AbaBTLx7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:53:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:42342 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753585AbaBTLx4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:53:56 -0500 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Bugfix for of_match_node ordering To: Kevin Hao , Sachin Kamat Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Rob Herring , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-samsung-soc In-Reply-To: <20140220101240.GA3745@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> References: <1392819290-1044-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> < CAK9yfHwwmZkFMRvxsxjBAfUbVXU3V+iPFDZO=DwQsFvJ3NQyKA@mail.gmail.com> < 20140220101240.GA3745@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:53:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20140220115351.0DF7BC4050F@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:12:40 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:09:08PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > I observe the following boot failure with today's (next-20140220) linux-next > > tree on Exynos based boards with the default exynos_defconfig. > > Does this help? I've merged this in. I could get my unicore test platform to fail to boot by turning on lock debugging. I'll leave that option on from now one. I've pushed this out to the following branch. Please test and report. It will also be picked up by linux-next tomorrow. git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux devicetree/merge > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c > index 8a27fc907ab6..9cc893530b9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/base.c > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c > @@ -381,12 +381,16 @@ static int __of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device, > > /* Compatible match has highest priority */ > if (compat && compat[0]) { > - of_property_for_each_string(device, "compatible", prop, cp) { > + prop = __of_find_property(device, "compatible", NULL); > + if (!prop) > + return 0; The above 2 lines are unnecessary. of_prop_next_string() will return NULL if prop is NULL. g. > + > + for (cp = of_prop_next_string(prop, NULL); cp; > + cp = of_prop_next_string(prop, cp), index++) { > if (of_compat_cmp(cp, compat, strlen(compat)) == 0) { > score = INT_MAX/2 - (index << 2); > break; > } > - index++; > } > if (!score) > return 0; > > > Thanks, > Kevin