From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932154AbaCDMLq (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:11:46 -0500 Received: from gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.217]:37357 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932066AbaCDMLo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:11:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:11:36 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gregory CLEMENT , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: dove: dt: revert PMU interrupt controller node Message-ID: <20140304121136.GR21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140207180836.GE8533@titan.lakedaemon.net> <1392667236-19126-1-git-send-email-jason@lakedaemon.net> <20140303150215.GI21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140303173740.GC16655@lunn.ch> <20140303181529.GM21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140303222406.GW1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140304092616.GH16655@lunn.ch> <5315AD6F.1070804@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5315AD6F.1070804@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:39:43AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 03/04/2014 10:26 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> I could have sworn this was discussed with this particular patchset, but >>> I'm unable to find the conversation in my archives. Neither during the >>> patch submission process, nor the (long) pull request thread. >>> >>> Perhaps it was an irc conversation? Andrew, Sebastian, can you find a >>> link? iirc, one of the DT maintainers (Mark Rutland?) raised the same >>> concern and I thought we answered that sufficiently... >> >> It was the cpufreq driver which caused the discussion. I looked at it >> for a while, and then task swapped onto the kirkwood move into >> mach-mvebu. > > I guess you are looking for this discussion > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/41053 > > and specifically Mark's remarks on PMU and DT in here > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/285384 > > BTW, +1 for a single PMU node that either serves an mfd (or type > of) driver or that subsystem drivers derive their resources from. > Looking at Dove FS, that would also include clock gating, which > could be a mess to sort out.. anyway, let's get it on. So we have cpufreq, pm domains and an irq controller. What's the plan for this, who's going to look at sorting this out? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.