From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757376AbaCDNx2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 08:53:28 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:49353 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757208AbaCDNx1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 08:53:27 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 108.39.110.144 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18tBfSdpRYQ/lx/FQ9qggRClHgUq2LVGRo= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 33C4A5398FE Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 08:53:06 -0500 From: Jason Cooper To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gregory CLEMENT , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: dove: dt: revert PMU interrupt controller node Message-ID: <20140304135306.GL1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <20140207180836.GE8533@titan.lakedaemon.net> <1392667236-19126-1-git-send-email-jason@lakedaemon.net> <20140303150215.GI21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140303173740.GC16655@lunn.ch> <20140303181529.GM21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140303222406.GW1872@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140304092616.GH16655@lunn.ch> <5315AD6F.1070804@gmail.com> <20140304121136.GR21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140304121136.GR21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:11:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:39:43AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > On 03/04/2014 10:26 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >>> I could have sworn this was discussed with this particular patchset, but > >>> I'm unable to find the conversation in my archives. Neither during the > >>> patch submission process, nor the (long) pull request thread. > >>> > >>> Perhaps it was an irc conversation? Andrew, Sebastian, can you find a > >>> link? iirc, one of the DT maintainers (Mark Rutland?) raised the same > >>> concern and I thought we answered that sufficiently... > >> > >> It was the cpufreq driver which caused the discussion. I looked at it > >> for a while, and then task swapped onto the kirkwood move into > >> mach-mvebu. > > > > I guess you are looking for this discussion > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/41053 > > > > and specifically Mark's remarks on PMU and DT in here > > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/285384 > > > > BTW, +1 for a single PMU node that either serves an mfd (or type > > of) driver or that subsystem drivers derive their resources from. > > Looking at Dove FS, that would also include clock gating, which > > could be a mess to sort out.. anyway, let's get it on. > > So we have cpufreq, pm domains and an irq controller. What's the plan > for this, who's going to look at sorting this out? Andrew, Sebastian? I'm currently task-saturated... thx, Jason.