From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755945AbaCECrO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:47:14 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55841 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754243AbaCECrN (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 21:47:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:03:26 +0800 From: Mark Brown To: Nenghua Cao Cc: Liam Girdwood , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20140305020326.GT13126@sirena.org.uk> References: <1392806653-29604-1-git-send-email-nhcao@marvell.com> <5305BBA6.3070105@marvell.com> <20140220085500.GX2669@sirena.org.uk> <5305F08F.8040008@marvell.com> <20140220134203.GA12197@sirena.org.uk> <53145D05.60207@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6axCafNXXMM8qu6Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53145D05.60207@marvell.com> X-Cookie: You are always busy. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 202.175.88.218 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] driver: regmap: add regmap_parse_val api X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --6axCafNXXMM8qu6Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 06:44:21PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: > Do you have any comments about these two patches? Thanks! I've not looked at it yet, please don't nag - one of the reasons it got bumped down my priority list is that you nagged previously. I tend to do this partly as a function of looking at the nag making me feel like I looked at the code and partly as a deliberate method for discouraging nags. Looking at this I do also notice that you didn't use a subject line matching the style for the subsystem which means it's going to be less likely to be looked at. Patches that aren't for subsystems I maintain tend to get a lower priority. --6axCafNXXMM8qu6Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTFoXrAAoJELSic+t+oim94K0P/1x/S7NckG7AZ/sU60bXRvS4 Lp/sc30tPjeJUPloZMsQ07Q4lJJbkwYOioFTIMm5wbbwGHNNCHZe7B3NHLakaaIa KRZBVah3Qsxapbi+xidKOZP62X/bFiwXzMOcFntGkumLmtoI7YXDp4F09EvesQZD EKMe0HlmxadZduOrAfz4TOmPRK04e4PaaJOzQNHYTtbFvCmuZHDtxK+FKyJJT8DW nzFJmScXwHHYkerbT2Uy+ERh87iDN9E5a0pfF+cVs4KzhCoaI4oC0S1zyzsmk3Ay B4uI9LybVSzJK5WTylUG6peg5UE82DNT8EFeFBtlk80W2Zc/okmOsvUkx2wC/Xsn IZB9ViIsu1tm/pbU/4iRrU4qlDX/T1X9qAb/LN5G4yrmsMnkqHZ/eTKRMplqblTd MJcLaxtyNFepW2yBBI7uQb4vhWe7VSY4PjZ3OCum/z9QjzsGYmekRLosW9mvixFH F8daR4RCsRk41/+PfC3eM9le11Ey638YJiamFFmjQJFp+cXf6TRU/4JC17MwUMQX RQGzqV2L0Gu2S8wfjiHECxKquQHhL2CidkpuGQCSrv8BAFAs9Po6xZNK/D2UDuns eSjgGnoVCEd+paxqWunc8fyM1qX5A1/buEsmFumQjhbUFl0nITnvM06M66JQTPb1 eSOdg9nM1MLn/Gi8XbpV =QrAp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6axCafNXXMM8qu6Q--