mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: remove deadlock due to waiting on IPI in softirq context
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:25:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140305162526.7d2ef1ab@cuia.bos.redhat.com> (raw)

There appears to be a deadlock in the hrtimer code. Specifically,
clock_was_set() calls an IPI with wait=1, from softirq context.

Waiting for IPIs to complete in irq context can lead to a deadlock,
because the current code (that was interrupted) might be holding some
kind of lock, that another CPU is waiting for with spin_lock_irq or
similar.

In other words, the current CPU may need to release a resource, before
the IPI can be handled by one of the destination CPUs.

To my untrained eye, it does not look like this patch introduces a
new bug to the timer code, but that is hard to ascertain with the
timer code. so I am posting this as an RFC for the timer gods to hurt
their brains on :)

This bug was introduced by 54cdfdb4 in early 2007 (the original
hrtimer code patch).

Not-yet-signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 0909436..19145ec 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
 	/* Retrigger the CPU local events everywhere */
-	on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 1);
+	on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0);
 #endif
 	timerfd_clock_was_set();
 }

             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-05 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-05 21:25 Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-03-05 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-05 21:54   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140305162526.7d2ef1ab@cuia.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome