From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: remove deadlock due to waiting on IPI in softirq context
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:25:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140305162526.7d2ef1ab@cuia.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
There appears to be a deadlock in the hrtimer code. Specifically,
clock_was_set() calls an IPI with wait=1, from softirq context.
Waiting for IPIs to complete in irq context can lead to a deadlock,
because the current code (that was interrupted) might be holding some
kind of lock, that another CPU is waiting for with spin_lock_irq or
similar.
In other words, the current CPU may need to release a resource, before
the IPI can be handled by one of the destination CPUs.
To my untrained eye, it does not look like this patch introduces a
new bug to the timer code, but that is hard to ascertain with the
timer code. so I am posting this as an RFC for the timer gods to hurt
their brains on :)
This bug was introduced by 54cdfdb4 in early 2007 (the original
hrtimer code patch).
Not-yet-signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 0909436..19145ec 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
/* Retrigger the CPU local events everywhere */
- on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0);
#endif
timerfd_clock_was_set();
}
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 21:25 Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-03-05 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-05 21:54 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140305162526.7d2ef1ab@cuia.bos.redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome