From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:18:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140307151820.GD30778@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140305223432.61b79278@stein>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Feb 21 Stefan Richter wrote:
> > On Feb 20 Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() are being phased out. They have few users
> > > and a nasty surprise in terms of reentrancy guarantee as workqueue
> > > considers work items to be different if they don't have the same work
> > > function.
> > >
> > > firewire core-device and sbp2 have been been multiplexing work items
> > > with multiple work functions. Introduce fw_device_workfn() and
> > > sbp2_lu_workfn() which invoke fw_device->workfn and
> > > sbp2_logical_unit->workfn respectively and always use the two
> > > functions as the work functions and update the users to set the
> > > ->workfn fields instead of overriding work functions using
> > > PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK().
> > >
> > > It would probably be best to route this with other related updates
> > > through the workqueue tree.
> > >
> > > Compile tested.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> > > Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> > Acked-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
>
> Actually, there is something missing in the changelog:
>
> This fixes a variety of possible regressions since a2c1c57be8d9
> "workqueue: consider work function when searching for busy work items"
> due to which fw_workqueue lost its required non-reentrancy property.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.9+
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.8.2+
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.4.60+
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.2.40+
>
> Tejun, will you be adding these and push the patch at the latest before
> v3.15-rc1? Otherwise, I will take over the patch and push it still this
> week, i.e. before v3.14-rc6.
I'll push this one through wq/for-3.14-fixes and route the others
through wq/for-3.15.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 20:44 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.15] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] wireless/rt2x00: don't use PREPARE_WORK in rt2800usb.c Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] ps3-vuart: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] floppy: don't use PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 9:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 1:44 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 2:07 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 2:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 5:13 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 10:03 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 12:51 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 13:06 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 16:53 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:01 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 23:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:46 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 14:38 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:48 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:43 ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 18:48 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:52 ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 19:03 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 1:23 ` memory-barriers.txt again (was Re: [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK) Stefan Richter
2014-02-23 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:35 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24 0:09 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-24 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24 0:32 ` Stefan Richter
2014-02-24 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK James Bottomley
2014-02-23 22:32 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 20:45 ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-05 21:34 ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-07 15:18 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-03-07 15:26 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] usb: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 15:06 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-21 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 15:14 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-22 15:20 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 23:03 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-23 4:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] afs: " Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging/fwserial: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 15:13 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 22:00 ` [PATCH 7/9] afs: don't use PREPARE_WORK David Howells
2014-02-20 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140307151820.GD30778@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome