From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753852AbaCJOiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:38:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com ([209.85.215.179]:49536 "EHLO mail-ea0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753822AbaCJOiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:38:03 -0400 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Move device tree graph parsing helpers to drivers/of To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Philipp Zabel , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomi Valkeinen , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Rob Herring , Laurent Pinchart , Kyungmin Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , Greg KH , Russell King - ARM Linux In-Reply-To: <20140310102630.3cb1bcd7@samsung.com> References: <1394126000.3622.66.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> < 20140307182330.75168C40AE3@trevor.secretlab.ca> <20140310102630.3cb1bcd7@ samsung.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:37:58 +0000 Message-Id: <20140310143758.3734FC405FA@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:26:30 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:23:30 +0000 > Grant Likely escreveu: > > > On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:13:20 +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > Hi Mauro, Russell, > > > > > > I have temporarily removed the simplified bindings at Sylwester's > > > request and updated the branch with the acks. The following changes > > > since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169: > > > > > > Linux 3.14-rc5 (2014-03-02 18:56:16 -0800) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git topic/of-graph > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to d484700a36952c6675aa47dec4d7a536929aa922: > > > > > > of: Warn if of_graph_parse_endpoint is called with the root node (2014-03-06 17:41:54 +0100) > > > > Nak. I made comments that haven't been resolved yet. I've replied with > > more detail tonight. The big issues are how drivers handle the optional > > 'ports' node and I do not agree to the double-linkage in the binding > > description. > > If I understood well, you're requesting to revert all those six patches > that were imported via git pull from my tree (and from Greg and Russell), > right? > > E. g. reverting those changesets: > d484700a3695 f2a575f67695 4329b93b283c 6ff60d397b17 4d56ed5a009b fd9fdb78a9bf > > as it seems that there's no easy way to revert a git pull. All trees containing the branch would need to be reverted. > I suspect that this will likely cause some harm when merging from our > trees upstream. It means any tree containing that branch *must* be rewound. See my reply to rmk. I've made a proposal on how I could be happy with leaving the branches alone. I'm not particularly happy, but there is a way to resolve things without reverts or rewinds. g.