From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754296AbaCJPi1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:38:27 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:37380 "EHLO mail-bk0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754278AbaCJPiW (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:38:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:38:15 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Gabriel FERNANDEZ , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Landley , Russell King , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, Giuseppe Condorelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: input: keyboard: st-keyscan: add keyscan driver Message-ID: <20140310153815.GE13661@lee--X1> References: <1393990772-9567-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1393990772-9567-2-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20140310114819.GO14976@lee--X1> <20140310152859.GA29054@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140310152859.GA29054@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > This patch adds ST Keyscan driver to use the keypad hw a subset > > > of ST boards provide. Specific board setup will be put in the > > > given dt. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez > > > > Are you sure these are in the correct order? > > > > What is the history of this commit? > > > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/input/st-keypad.txt | 50 ++++ > > > > This should be submitted as a seperate patch. > > Why do we have such requirement? To me it would make more sense to add > binding documentation in the same commit as the code that uses these > bindings. I'm inclined to agree with you and that's actually how we used to do it, but a decision was made by the DT guys at one of the Kernel Summits to submit Documentation as a separate patch. > [...] > > > > + > > > + error = matrix_keypad_parse_of_params(dev, &pdata->num_out_pads, > > > + &pdata->num_in_pads); > > > + if (error) { > > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse keypad params\n"); > > > + return error; > > > > Nit: It's pretty unusual to use this for a standard error handling > > variable. Consider 'ret' or 'err' as a replacement. > > I like "error", in fact there are a lot of these in input. I use "error" for > data that is only returned from error path and "retval" when the same > variable is returned in both success and error paths. If that's your preference then I'm cool with it too. Scrap my comment. [...] -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog