From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754573AbaCLN4F (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:56:05 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:33356 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753603AbaCLN4C (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:56:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:55:28 +0000 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stefani Seibold , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Dave Jones , Martin Runge , Andreas Brief Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support Message-ID: <20140312135528.2b0dfa87@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <531F365B.4060000@linux.intel.com> <531F3D02.30706@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So 32-bit x86 is dead, dead, dead. There's absolutely no future to it. > We're not adding new stuff to "future-proof" it. I think you underestimate how long it'll be present given the advantages of 32bit in certain situations like very very small devices. Intel is still releasing new 32bit processors (SoC X1020D etc - 'Quark') Alan