mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: hpa@linux.intel.com, linux@horizon.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support
Date: 13 Mar 2014 03:08:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140313070846.27888.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFz+OfvtXLxg4CA4C6GPGh8F_aDuG6nnFFCCBpjTPLP1zA@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Leader spake:
> So 32-bit x86 is dead, dead, dead. There's absolutely no future to it.
> We're not adding new stuff to "future-proof" it.

I think you have a small error of perspective here.  I agree the future
for 32-bit kernels is very limited.  But this is about 32-bit binary
support, and lots of people run 32-bit binaries, even on 64-bit kernels.

The great majority of applications have no need for more than 4G of
address space and frequently people would rather avoid the pointer
bloat that going to 64 bits would cause.

The whole reason that the x32 ABI has been added to the kernel is to
better support this kind of application.  But non-long-mode binaries
are still a lowest common denominator.

E.g Firefox full releases come in 32- and 64-bit versions, but the
precompiled betas are 32-bit only.

It still may not be worth it, but 32-bit binaries will be with us
for a long time.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-13  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-11  1:03 Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11  2:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  3:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11  4:10       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  8:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-11  9:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 14:53           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 15:30             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 16:14               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 16:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 16:42                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:42                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 16:45                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:50                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:52                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 17:14                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:16                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12  8:30                           ` Stefani Seibold
2014-03-12 14:41                             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 15:46                               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 16:04                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 16:18                                   ` Brian Gerst
2014-03-12 16:18                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 19:41                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 20:52                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 21:37                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-12 21:45                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 21:46                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 21:49                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 23:06                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-12 23:43                                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 23:46                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-13 16:23                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 13:55                           ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-03-13  7:08                           ` George Spelvin [this message]
2014-03-11 17:03                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:07                       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140313070846.27888.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®