From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:52:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317235229.GQ21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531F5799.2070302@linaro.org>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:36:09PM -0400, David Long wrote:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/dave.long/linux.git uprobes-v7
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e55c35236b8adf79453a998506ec6081833b9484:
>
> ARM: add uprobes support (2014-03-11 11:40:29 -0400)
I pulled this a week ago into my devel-testing (which is unpublished),
and while it hasn't shown any signs of functional problems, I was just
about to merge it into devel-stable when I noticed the history.
This is based upon:
Merge branch 'for-next' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6
+ Linux 3.11
+ Merge branch 'perf-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
+ Linux 3.12-rc5
+ Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
+ Linux 3.13-rc3
+ Linux 3.13-rc4
+ Linux 3.13-rc8
+ Linux 3.14-rc2
+ Linux 3.14-rc4
+ Linux 3.14-rc5
|
[your uprobes patches]
where each + is a merge of the named commit into the previous. This is
the kind of thing which will make Linus quite unhappy: please base
patches off a plain -rc release, not off a merge commit.
I'm sure there's others on the mailing list who can guide you on this
point, but I do need to ask you to re-spin without those merges. I'm
happy to take a respin of it provided it's based on 3.14-rc5 (so I can
more easily confirm that there aren't any changes which I haven't
already tested.)
Thanks, and sorry about the lateness of this email.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 20:10 [PATCH v7 00/15] " David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] uprobes: Kconfig dependency fix David Long
2014-03-08 11:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-03-08 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] ARM: Fix missing includes in kprobes sources David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] uprobes: allow ignoring of probe hits David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] ARM: move shared uprobe/kprobe definitions into new include file David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] ARM: Move generic arm instruction parsing code to new files for sharing between features David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] ARM: move generic thumb instruction parsing code to new files for use by other feature David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] ARM: use a function table for determining instruction interpreter action David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] ARM: Remove use of struct kprobe from generic probes code David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] ARM: Make the kprobes condition_check symbol names more generic David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] ARM: Change more ARM kprobes symbol names to something " David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] ARM: Rename the shared kprobes/uprobe return value enum David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] ARM: Change the remaining shared kprobes/uprobes symbols to something generic David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] ARM: Add an emulate flag to the kprobes/uprobes instruction decode functions David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] ARM: Make arch_specific_insn a define for new arch_probes_insn structure David Long
2014-03-07 20:10 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] ARM: add uprobes support David Long
2014-03-08 11:18 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] uprobes: Add uprobes support for ARM Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-03-11 18:36 ` [GIT PULL] " David Long
2014-03-17 23:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-03-18 22:15 ` David Long
2014-03-19 20:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140317235229.GQ21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®