From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755296AbaCSUE3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:04:29 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:38406 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752136AbaCSUE2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:04:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:04:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20140319.160425.2139869352245055503.davem@davemloft.net> To: benchan@chromium.org Cc: bjorn@mork.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gsuarez@smithmicro.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: cdc_ncm: respect operator preferred MTU reported by MBIM From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20140317.214148.2254695408331774828.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Chan Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:00:06 -0700 > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Ben Chan >> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:46:27 -0700 >> >>> Thanks again for the review and tip. I've submitted patch v2 to >>> address the le16_to_cpu conversion. >> >> When you update a patch from a series, you should repost the entire >> patch set, rather than just the patch which changes. >> >> This avoids any and all ambiguity of which patches go with which >> others. > > Thanks for pointing that out. I've submitted the whole patch set as v3 > (bumped the revision to avoid confusion). I hate to ask for a repost, but: 1) Please put Greg KH's ACK into patch #1, patchwork doesn't carry ACKs from one submission to the next, as it shouldn't. 2) Please give a leading "[PATCH 0/2] ..." posting explaining at a high level what this series is doing. Also, make it explicit what tree you want me to apply this too, and if the changes are relevant for -stable.