From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758452AbaCTMGv (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:06:51 -0400 Received: from mail.karo-electronics.de ([81.173.242.67]:52002 "EHLO mail.karo-electronics.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758391AbaCTMGs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:06:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:05:49 +0100 From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= To: Simon Budig Cc: Mark Rutland , Dmitry Torokhov , Fugang Duan , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Henrik Rydberg , Ian Campbell , Jingoo Han , Kumar Gala , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Sachin Kamat , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] Input: edt-ft5x06: Add DT support Message-ID: <20140320130549.3bc2925e@ipc1.ka-ro> In-Reply-To: <532AD571.9000907@kernelconcepts.de> References: <1395234563-11034-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1395234563-11034-3-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <20140320093719.GB14420@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20140320124055.53d469e7@ipc1.ka-ro> <532AD571.9000907@kernelconcepts.de> Organization: Ka-Ro electronics GmbH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Simon Budig wrote: > On 20/03/14 12:40, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > The FT5x06 datasheet lists 3 variants for different panel sizes. > > I'll add distinct compatible strings for those chips, though their SW > > interface is (currently) identical: > > |Required properties: > > | - compatible: "edt,edt-ft5206", "edt,edt-ft5x06" > > | or: "edt,edt-ft5306", "edt,edt-ft5x06" > > | or: "edt,edt-ft5406", "edt,edt-ft5x06" > > Please note that the M09 variants of the polytouch family will use the > same chips, but a different sw protocol (see Patch 5/5). > The firmware version can be detected by SW, thus there is no need to distinguish it via DT. > I don't know anything about the naming scheme used in the device tree, > but I am not sure if the chip-ID is actually useful here. > Since the chip variants handle different panel sizes, it might be useful to be able to distinguish them. Lothar Waßmann -- ___________________________________________________________ Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10 Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996 www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de ___________________________________________________________