mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: fix dpath buffer corruption for too small buffers
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:36:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140323043643.GA25566@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394666986-24727-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 01:29:46AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> During dentry path lookups we can end up corrupting memory if the
> destination path buffer is too small. This is because prepend_path()
> and prepend() adjust the passed buffer length unconditionally, allowing
> for the buffer length to go negative. Then a later prepend_name() call
> will receive a negative length and convert this to unsigned before
> comparing it against the source string length leading to a possible
> memory corruption preceeding the destination buffer.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 265e0ce..4015fd9 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -2833,7 +2833,8 @@ static int prepend_name(char **buffer, int *buflen, struct qstr *name)
>  	u32 dlen = ACCESS_ONCE(name->len);
>  	char *p;
>  
> -	if (*buflen < dlen + 1)
> +	/* make sure we don't convert a negative value to unsigned int */
> +	if (*buflen < 0 || *buflen < dlen + 1)
>  		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
>  	*buflen -= dlen + 1;

It's much easier to fix, actually.  Look at the callers of prepend_name();
when it returns a negative value, they either discard the value left in
*buflen (__dentry_path()) or pass it back to their caller and return a
negative value themselves (prepend_path()).  The same is true for
prepend_path() (discared in __d_path(), d_absolute_path(), sys_getcwd();
passed to caller with negative return value in path_with_deleted()) and
path_with_deleted() (the only caller is d_path() and it always discards).

In other words, when prepend_name() returns -ENAMETOOLONG, it is free to
leave whatever it wants in *buflen.  So let's do what prepend() does -
subtract from *buflen, then check if the result has become negative.
Generates a better code than the original, actually...

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-23  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-12 23:29 Imre Deak
2014-03-23  4:36 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-03-23 16:07   ` Imre Deak
2014-03-24 12:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140323043643.GA25566@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome