From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753344AbaCXMvp (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:51:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:55264 "EHLO mail-qa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752882AbaCXMvm (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:51:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:51:39 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Vince Weaver Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] workqueue: Provide destroy_delayed_work_on_stack() Message-ID: <20140324125139.GC29892@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20140323141648.703530841@linutronix.de> <20140323141939.911487677@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140323141939.911487677@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:20:44PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > If a delayed or deferrable work is on stack we need to tell debug > objects that we are destroying the timer and the work. Otherwise we > leak the tracking object. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Tejun Heo Acked-by: Tejun Heo How do you want to route this? If it's better to route it with the next patch, please feel free to do so. Thanks. -- tejun