From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755374AbaCZAmm (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:42 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:24660 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754896AbaCZAmh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:37 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 108.39.110.144 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19wV9XqAC/tSeFFFaH1kXJTAo/+LRpVX9M= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 8591754C137 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:42:23 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Petazzoni , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] CPU idle for Armada XP Message-ID: <20140326004223.GL28304@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1395787705-31061-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395787705-31061-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gregory, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:48:11PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: ... > The first patch should go through ARM subsystem and should be taken by > Russell King. I made few change on it following Lorenzo advice and > now it will reuse the cpu v7 suspend and resume function and just do > specific operation before calling them. > > The 13th patch 'cpuidle: mvebu: Add initial cpu idle support for > Armada 370/XP SoC' is the only one who should go to the cpuidle > subsystem. But of course I would like that Daniel Lezcano or Rafael > J. Wysocki have a look on the whole series and especially patches 10, > 12 and 14. Ok, I'm tired. :) Help me out here. Patches 1 and 13 are depended on by the other patches and vice-versa, right? In that case, I'm thinking it's best to seek Acks from the other maintainers and keep the whole branch together. Please tell me if I'm wrong. thx, Jason.