From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751519AbaDOHxn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:53:43 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53990 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbaDOHxk (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 03:53:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:53:10 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Vincent Guittot , "mingo@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "fenghua.yu@intel.com" , "schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" , "cmetcalf@tilera.com" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Message-ID: <20140415075310.GI11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1397209481-28542-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <534937F0.3020702@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534937F0.3020702@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:56:16PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote: > >This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset [1]. > >I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the > >thing easier. > >-configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset) > >-update and consolidation of cpu_power > >-tasks packing algorithm > > > >Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to configure > >the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level like > >the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM architecture. > > > >[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121 > >[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239 > >[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449 > > Hi Vincent, > > given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4: > > For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT > machine): > > Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann > Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann Thanks guys!