mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] workqueue: fix double unlock bug
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:43:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415144324.GJ1863@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1798086.IHnGGWGxmu@daeseok-laptop.cloud.net>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:17:43AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> 
> Use default pwq when alloc_unbound_pwq() is failed.
> 
> And remove "if" condition for whether "pwq" is same as "wq->dfl_pwq"
> when wq_calc_node_cpumask() returns false and just use "goto use_dfl_pwq"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>

This is an awfully inadequate patch description.  Can you change it to
something like the following?

  workqueue: fix bugs in wq_update_unbound_numa() failure path

  wq_update_unbound_numa() failure path has the following two bugs.

  * alloc_unbound_pwq() is called without holding wq->mutex; however, if
    the allocation fails, it jumps to out_unlock which tries to unlock
    wq->mutex.

  * The function should switch to dfl_pwq on failure but didn't do so
    after alloc_unbound_pwq() failure.

  Fix it by regrabbing wq->mutex and jumping to use_dfl_pwq on
  alloc_unbound_pwq() failure.
      

> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 0ee63af..0679854 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -4087,10 +4087,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
>  		if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
>  			goto out_unlock;
>  	} else {
> -		if (pwq == wq->dfl_pwq)
> -			goto out_unlock;
> -		else
> -			goto use_dfl_pwq;
> +		goto use_dfl_pwq;

And please put this in a separate patch.  Patches which are to be
backported through -stable should be minimal.  Also, please update the
comment above to reflect the change.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 23:17 Daeseok Youn
2014-04-15  3:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-15 14:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-04-15 23:01   ` DaeSeok Youn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140415144324.GJ1863@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®