From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754181AbaDPQrp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:47:45 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58543 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040AbaDPQrm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:47:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:47:39 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: bidi support Message-ID: <20140416164739.GA19947@lst.de> References: <1397634299-7466-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1397634299-7466-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <534EB2BA.7020705@kernel.dk> <20140416164406.GA19850@lst.de> <534EB38F.7050801@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534EB38F.7050801@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:45:03AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > There's nothing wrong with the check, it's identical to one I sent out > last week. But it's not part of the bidi enable patch, it's a separate > bug fix for bsg. Do you want to split it up while applying or should I resend two separate patches?