From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] sysctl: allow for strict write position handling
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:45:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140421154505.eef405f0a23e2ff8a1c7536e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397780183-24633-4-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:16:22 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> When writing to a sysctl string, each write, regardless of VFS position,
> begins writing the string from the start. This means the contents of
> the last write to the sysctl controls the string contents instead of
> the first:
>
> open("/proc/sys/kernel/modprobe", O_WRONLY) = 1
> write(1, "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"..., 4096) = 4096
> write(1, "/bin/true", 9) = 9
> close(1) = 0
>
> $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe
> /bin/true
>
> Expected behaviour would be to have the sysctl be "AAAA..." capped at
> maxlen (in this case KMOD_PATH_LEN: 256), instead of truncating to the
> contents of the second write. Similarly, multiple short writes would not
> append to the sysctl.
>
> This provides CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL_STRICT_WRITES as a way to make this
> behavior act in a less surprising manner for strings, and disallows
> non-zero file position when writing numeric sysctls (similar to what is
> already done when reading from non-zero file positions).
Adding a Kconfig knob to alter the behavior of procfs writes creeps me
out. I wonder why.
- I doubt if many people have a sufficient amount of control over
their entire systems to be able to confidently set
CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL_STRICT_WRITES.
- Software will be shipped which runs OK with one setting but breaks
with the other setting.
So what to do?
I think we can *detect* this situation easily enough. So some options are
a) change the behaviour and add code which detects when userspace is
doing a write whose behaviour is now altered. Print a warning. Or
b) leave the behaviour as-is. Add a detector which tells people
"hey, your userspace is probably broken - please fix". Wait N
years. Then alter the behaviour as in a).
In either case the detector should display current->comm, the procfs
pathname and the contents of the write, to aid people in hunting down
and fixing their userspace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-21 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 0:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] sysctl: fix incorrect " Kees Cook
2014-04-18 0:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sysctl: clean up char buffer arguments Kees Cook
2014-04-18 0:28 ` Andi Kleen
2014-04-18 6:24 ` Kees Cook
2014-04-18 0:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sysctl: refactor sysctl string writing logic Kees Cook
2014-04-18 0:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sysctl: allow for strict write position handling Kees Cook
2014-04-21 22:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-04-22 4:52 ` Kees Cook
2014-04-22 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-22 18:37 ` Kees Cook
2014-04-18 0:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] test: validate CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL_STRICT_WRITES Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140421154505.eef405f0a23e2ff8a1c7536e@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agshew@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome