mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: fix sysfs-attribute removal deadlock
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:35:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424143517.GC14460@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398328155.2805.100.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:29:15PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 10:19 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > cc'ing Li Zhong who's working on a simliar issue in the following
> > thread and quoting whole body.
> > 
> >   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1680706
> > 
> > Li, this is another variation of the same problem.  Maybe this can be
> > covered by your work too?
> 
> It seems to me that it is about write something to driver attribute, and
> driver unloading. If so, maybe it's not easy to reuse the help functions
> created for device attribute, and device removing.
> 
> But I guess the idea to break the active protection could still be
> applied here:
> 
> Maybe we could try_module_get() here (like the other option suggested by
> Johan?), and break active protection if we could get the module,
> something like below? 

I don't get why try_module_get() matters here.  We can't call into
->store if the object at hand is already destroyed and the underlying
module can't go away if the target device is still alive.
try_module_get() doesn't actually protect the object.  Why does that
matter?  This is self removal, right?  Can you please take a look at
kernfs_remove_self()?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23  9:32 Johan Hovold
2014-04-23 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-24  8:29   ` Li Zhong
2014-04-24 14:35     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-04-24 14:52       ` Johan Hovold
2014-04-25  2:16         ` Li Zhong
2014-04-25 10:15           ` Johan Hovold
2014-04-28  0:39             ` Li Zhong
2014-05-02 15:20               ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-25 13:59           ` Alan Stern
2014-04-28  1:58             ` Li Zhong
2014-04-25  2:15       ` Li Zhong
2014-04-25 13:54         ` Alan Stern
2014-04-25 15:13           ` Johan Hovold
2014-04-28  1:55           ` Li Zhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140424143517.GC14460@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jhovold@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®