From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix v2] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by CPU hot-addition
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:09:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140428070954.GM11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398653293-12483-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:48:13AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Intel platforms with Nehalem/Westmere/IvyBridge CPUs may support socket
> hotplug/online at runtime. The CPU hot-addition flow is:
> 1) handle CPU hot-addition event
> 1.a) gather platform specific information
> 1.b) associate hot-added CPU with NUMA node
> 1.c) create CPU device
> 2) online hot-added CPU through sysfs:
> 2.a) cpu_up()
> 2.b) ->try_online_node()
> 2.c) ->hotadd_new_pgdat()
> 2.d) ->node_set_online()
>
> Between 1.b and 2.c, hot-added CPUs are associated with NUMA nodes
> but those NUMA nodes may still be in offlined state. So we should
> check node_online(nid) before calling kmalloc_node(nid) and friends,
> otherwise it may cause invalid memory access as below.
So complete and full NAK on this. This is a workaround for a fucked in
the head BIOS. If you're going to do a work around for that they should
live in arch/ space, not in core code.
The code in question is nearly 7 years old (2.6.24), which leads me to
believe it works just fine for (regular) memory less nodes as I've not
had complaints about it before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 2:48 Jiang Liu
2014-04-28 7:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-30 4:26 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140428070954.GM11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome