From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754933AbaEAPCh (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 11:02:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:62935 "EHLO mail-qc0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754620AbaEAPCf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 11:02:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 11:02:31 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Christoph Lameter , Kevin Hilman , Lai Jiangshan , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask Message-ID: <20140501150231.GD31611@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1398350256-7834-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1398350256-7834-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20140424153716.GG14460@htj.dyndns.org> <20140501150114.GD25369@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140501150114.GD25369@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Another thing with naming is that I didn't anticipate having > > attributes at the top directory so the workqueue directories aren't > > namespaced. Maybe we want to namespace top level knobs? > > "system_cpumask" maybe? Any better ideas? > > Not sure why you want that. It makes sense on directories grouping > file for different subsystem. But here? Worried about possible conflicts with workqueue names if we end up with more attributes. Thanks. -- tejun