From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754897AbaEAPJa (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 11:09:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:59775 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752140AbaEAPJ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 11:09:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 17:09:20 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Tejun Heo Cc: LKML , Christoph Lameter , Kevin Hilman , Lai Jiangshan , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask Message-ID: <20140501150918.GE25369@localhost.localdomain> References: <1398350256-7834-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1398350256-7834-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20140424153716.GG14460@htj.dyndns.org> <20140501150114.GD25369@localhost.localdomain> <20140501150231.GD31611@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140501150231.GD31611@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:02:31AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Another thing with naming is that I didn't anticipate having > > > attributes at the top directory so the workqueue directories aren't > > > namespaced. Maybe we want to namespace top level knobs? > > > "system_cpumask" maybe? Any better ideas? > > > > Not sure why you want that. It makes sense on directories grouping > > file for different subsystem. But here? > > Worried about possible conflicts with workqueue names if we end up > with more attributes. But they are already protected in their own directories. Also having the same file attribute names in root and in individual directories suggests that root attributes primes on the childs.