From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755077AbaEHR3k (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2014 13:29:40 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:57806 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752485AbaEHR3j (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2014 13:29:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20140508.132937.1739161639772164878.davem@davemloft.net> To: andreas.irestal@axis.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, abrodkin@synopsys.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, sr@denx.de, jonas.jensen@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jespern@axis.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net:Add basic DWC Ethernet QoS Driver From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <201405081450.14449.Andreas.Irestal@axis.com> References: <201405081450.14449.Andreas.Irestal@axis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 08 May 2014 10:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Why did you post this patch twice? Is there some difference between the two versions?