From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755359AbaEIOGP (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 10:06:15 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:23355 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752606AbaEIOGM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 10:06:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1018,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="529151129" From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Armin Rigo , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: References: <1399552888-11024-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20140508160205.A0EC7E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] remap_file_pages() decommission Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20140509140536.F06BFE009B@blue.fi.intel.com> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 17:05:36 +0300 (EEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > >> i.e. if you remove or > >> emulate remap_file_pages(), please increase the default limit as well. > > > > It's fine to me. Andrew? > > Not Andrew, but one thing we might look at is to make the limit > per-user rather than per-vm. Hm. I'm confused here. Do we have any limit forced per-user? I only see things like rlimits which are copied from parrent. Is it what you want? -- Kirill A. Shutemov