Re: [PATCH v4] drivers: sh: compile drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c if ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI

[Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:43:49AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:25:21AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:24:03AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:12:29PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> >> >> >> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Tested on Koelsch (legacy, reference, shmobile, and shmobile+bbb kernels)
> >> >> >> > and BeagleBone Black (shmobile+bbb). Will test on more hardware tomorrow.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Tested on genmai with Wolfram's CCF support.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks, shall I go ahead and queue this up?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes please, at least from my side everything looks perfect.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, will do.
> >> >
> >> > I currently plan to send this on to Linus when the merge window
> >> > opens for v3.16.
> >>
> >> Actually we had hoped this could land in v3.15, so we can fix the regression
> >> introduced in v3.14 by bf98c1eac1d4a6bcf00532e4fa41d8126cd6c187 as
> >> soon as possible.
> >
> > Ok, so I should/can treat this as a fix?
> 
> Yes, definitely.

Thanks, will do.