From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752369AbaENHpD (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 03:45:03 -0400 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:39610 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145AbaENHpA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 03:45:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:44:57 +0200 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt To: Ley Foon Tan Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chung-Lin Tang , Haavard Skinnemoen Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/25] avr32: Add 32 bit time_t and clock_t Message-ID: <20140514074456.GB17409@samfundet.no> References: <1399971456-3941-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <1399971769-4116-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <20140513201944.GA14023@samfundet.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Wed 14 May 2014 09:54:25 +0800 or thereabout, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >> Around Tue 13 May 2014 17:02:49 +0800 or thereabout, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> Override time_t and clock_t in include/uapi/asm-generic. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan >> >> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt >> >> Quickly looked over some of the other patches in the series, and they all >> seem to add the same. Could this be generic, with the possibility for arch to >> override? > In this patchset, the generic one will be 64 bit (long long). So, the > existing 32 bit users need to override this. Would it be wrong to use the architecture defined size, or does some 32-bit architectures use 64-bit time types? -- Hans-Christian Egtvedt