From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: kaslr to avoid setup_data regions
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:13:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140514081325.GA8992@mguzik.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514080201.GA18922@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:02:01PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> X86 will pass setup_data region while necessary, these regions could be
> overwitten by kernel due to kaslr.
>
> Thus iterate and add setup regions to mem_avoid[] in this patch.
> Set max mem avoid entries 32, hopefully it will be enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> @@ -110,8 +110,9 @@ struct mem_vector {
> unsigned long size;
> };
>
> -#define MEM_AVOID_MAX 5
> +#define MEM_AVOID_MAX 32
> static struct mem_vector mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_MAX];
> +static int mem_avoid_nr;
>
> static bool mem_contains(struct mem_vector *region, struct mem_vector *item)
> {
> @@ -135,6 +136,28 @@ static bool mem_overlaps(struct mem_vect
> return true;
> }
>
> +static void mem_avoid_setup_data(void)
> +{
> + struct setup_data *data;
> + u64 pa_data;
> +
> + if (mem_avoid_nr >= MEM_AVOID_MAX) {
> + debug_putstr("KASLR: too many setup_data ranges.\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pa_data = real_mode->hdr.setup_data;
> + while (pa_data) {
> + data = (struct setup_data *)pa_data;
> + if (pa_data < CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET) {
> + mem_avoid[mem_avoid_nr].start = pa_data;
> + mem_avoid[mem_avoid_nr].size = sizeof(*data) + data->len;
> + mem_avoid_nr++;
> + }
> + pa_data = data->next;
> + }
> +}
> +
I have no idea if this real_mode->hdr.setup_data examination is correct,
so not commenting on that.
What prevents the loop from overflowing the table?
Additinally reaching the limit should at least result in a big fat warning.
--
Mateusz Guzik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 8:02 Dave Young
2014-05-14 8:13 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2014-05-14 8:23 ` Dave Young
2014-05-14 9:09 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140514081325.GA8992@mguzik.redhat.com \
--to=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®