From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756258AbaENPDA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 11:03:00 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:40206 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755748AbaENPC6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 11:02:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:02:56 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: "[Chander Kashyap" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Chander Kashyap , Inderpal Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: discard duplicate OPP additions Message-ID: <20140514150255.GA8330@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1399966890-22926-1-git-send-email-k.chander@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399966890-22926-1-git-send-email-k.chander@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > From: Chander Kashyap > > It may be possible to unregister and re-register the cpufreq driver. > One such example is arm big-little IKS cpufreq driver. While > re-registering the driver, same OPPs may get added again. Hmm. Would it be better to actually delete stale OPPs? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html