From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: don't set READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for EM_AARCH64
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140515090535.GB27594@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514185720.GI26038@redacted.bos.redhat.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 07:57:21PM +0100, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC is currently being set for
> AArch64 binaries, resulting in an executable stack, when no explicit
> PT_GNU_STACK header is present.
>
> [kmcmarti@sedition ~]$ uname -p
> aarch64
> [kmcmarti@sedition ~]$ cat /proc/$$/personality
> 00400000
>
> The reason for this is, without an explicit PT_GNU_STACK entry in the
> binary, stk is still set to EXSTACK_DEFAULT (which should be
> non-executable on AArch64.) As a result, elf_read_implies_exec is true,
> and we set READ_IMPLIES_EXEC in binfmt_elf.c:load_elf_binary.
>
> Fix this to return 0 in the native case, and parrot the logic from
> arch/arm/kernel/elf.c otherwise. With this patch, binaries correctly
> don't have READ_IMPLIES_EXEC set, and we can let PT_GNU_STACK change
> things if it's explicitly requested.
Unfortunately, my understanding is that GCC currently requires this for
nested functions, so this is an effective ABI breakage. On the plus side,
the GCC guys are planning to fix that, so we should see PT_GNU_STACK getting
used more frequently in the future.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-15 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 18:57 Kyle McMartin
2014-05-15 9:05 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-05-15 16:45 ` Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140515090535.GB27594@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kyle@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®