From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755929AbaEOTp3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 15:45:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:40559 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752866AbaEOTp1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 15:45:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:45:23 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, bp@suse.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgalbraith@suse.de, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 UPDATED 3/3] CPU hotplug, smp: Flush any pending IPI callbacks before CPU offline Message-ID: <20140515194523.GD21306@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140515191218.19811.25887.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20140515191358.19811.70381.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20140515191938.GB21306@htj.dyndns.org> <537514D3.4060308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140515193656.GM4570@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <537518D6.6030006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537518D6.6030006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:13:18AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > On 05/16/2014 01:06 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:56:11AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > >> On 05/16/2014 12:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:44:13AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > >>>> /* > >>>> + * flush_smp_call_function_queue - Flush any pending smp-call-function > >>> > >>> Don't we need a blank line here? > >> > >> Hmm? That sentence continues on the next line, hence I didn't add any blank > >> line there. > > > > Tejun might be wanting this to be a docbook comment, in which case > > it also needs "/**" at the beginning of the comment. > > > > Oh, I see. Like this? Yeah, looks good to me. Thanks. -- tejun