From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932367AbaEPLZ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 07:25:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28964 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343AbaEPLZz (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 07:25:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:25:14 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Don Zickus Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, peterz@infradead.org, LKML , namhyung@gmail.com, eranian@google.com, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Revert "perf: Disable PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 support" Message-ID: <20140516112514.GC19475@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1399999697-65875-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1399999697-65875-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399999697-65875-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:48:13PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: SNIP > - /* > - * Anon maps don't have the execname. > - */ > - if (n < 4) > + n = sscanf(bf, "%"PRIx64"-%"PRIx64" %s %"PRIx64" %x:%x %u %s\n", > + &event->mmap2.start, &event->mmap2.len, prot, > + &event->mmap2.pgoff, &event->mmap2.maj, > + &event->mmap2.min, > + &ino, execname); > + > + event->mmap2.ino = (u64)ino; > + > + if (n < 7) > continue; any reason for changing this from 'if (n != 8)' ? jirka