From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757651AbaEPSfG (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 14:35:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:36262 "EHLO mail-qc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751365AbaEPSfD (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 14:35:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:35:00 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Kevin Hilman , Lai Jiangshan , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: Create low-level unbound workqueues cpumask Message-ID: <20140516183500.GI5379@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1400257015-28222-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1400257015-28222-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:52:26PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > It works on a lower-level than the per WQ_SYSFS workqueues cpumask files > > such that the effective cpumask applied for a given unbound workqueue is > > the intersection of /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/$WORKQUEUE/cpumask and > > the new /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/cpumask_unbounds file. > > Why is there "virtual" directory in the path? Workqueues are "virtual" > devices? I ain't an actual one. That apparently is the preferred place to present software constructs like workqueues in sysfs. Thanks. -- tejun