From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932416AbaESPyL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 11:54:11 -0400 Received: from alerce.vps.bitfolk.com ([85.119.82.134]:45150 "EHLO alerce.vps.bitfolk.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932355AbaESPyJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 11:54:09 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2501 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 19 May 2014 11:54:09 EDT Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:11:20 +0100 From: Rodrigo Campos To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Jiri Olsa , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Andi Kleen , Arun Sharma Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/21] perf tools: Add support to accumulate hist periods (v9) Message-ID: <20140519151120.GE24333@sdfg.com.ar> References: <1395293806-25847-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1395293806-25847-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:36:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report. > This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely > rewrote it from scratch. > > This version depends on my previous percentage patchset [2] and output > field patchset[3]. So please test this again although there's not > much change in the series itself. > > This patchset basically adds period in a sample to every node in the > callchain. A hist_entry now has an additional fields to keep the > cumulative period if --children option is given on perf report. > > I changed the option as a separate --children and added a new > "Children" column (and renamed the default "Overhead" column into > "Self"). The output will be sorted by children (cumulative) overhead > for now. It also adds 'overhead_children' field to -F/--fields option > to be selected by user and it'll show you "N/A" if the cumulation is > not supported (due to missing callchain). Is there something I can help to have this merged ? As far as I tested, this works fine here. Or is this ok, just waiting on the "perf report: Add -F option for specifying output fields" patchset ? Thanks a lot, Rodrigo