From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751377AbaETFjc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 20 May 2014 01:39:32 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:58400 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751184AbaETFjb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 May 2014 01:39:31 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:39:28 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree
Message-ID: <20140520053928.GA1751@infradead.org>
References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org>
 <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:03:43AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Is this a request for inclusion of those branches into linux-next
> separately from the scsi tree itself?

James said he wants to include it in the scsi tree, but given how late
we are in the cycle I'd love to see separate exposure until that happens
on a temporary basis.