From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751301AbaETGRL (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2014 02:17:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:51743 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750745AbaETGRJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2014 02:17:09 -0400 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq_byname() To: Thierry Reding , Grygorii Strashko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Rob Herring , Tony Lindgren In-Reply-To: <20140519125738.GB9466@ulmo> References: <1400506259-18397-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20140519125738.GB9466@ulmo> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:00 +0900 Message-Id: <20140520061700.ED542C41087@trevor.secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 May 2014 14:57:39 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:30:59PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c > [...] > > /** > > + * of_irq_get_byname - Decode a node's IRQ and return it as a Linux irq number > > + * @dev: pointer to device tree node > > + * @name: zero-based index of the irq > > This is a name, not an index. > > > + * > > + * Returns Linux irq number on success, or -EPROBE_DEFER if the irq domain > > + * is not yet created, or errorno in case of failure. > > s/errorno/error code/? Also EPROBE_DEFER is also an error code, so I'm > not sure if it's worth a special case in the description here. > > > + * > > + */ > > +int of_irq_get_byname(struct device_node *dev, const char *name) > > +{ > > + const char *name_irq = NULL; > > + int index = 0; > > + > > + if (unlikely(!name)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + while (!of_property_read_string_index(dev, "interrupt-names", > > + index, &name_irq)) > > + if (!strcmp(name, name_irq)) > > + return of_irq_get(dev, index); > > Isn't this missing an index++ somewhere? Otherwise it seems like this > would loop infinitely if there was no match on the first entry. Better yet, use of_property_match_string(). g. > > Thierry