From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752406AbaETAD7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 20:03:59 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:37546 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbaETAD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 20:03:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:03:43 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree Message-ID: <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i486-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/SA1utnxSaG3OjH0zuGrH_th"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/SA1utnxSaG3OjH0zuGrH_th Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christoph, On Mon, 19 May 2014 07:06:14 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wr= ote: > > I'd like to announce the new scsi patch queue tree, which will pick up > any scsi core or driver patches promptly to allow easy integration and > feedback that contributors might be used to from other kernel subsystems. >=20 > There are two branches, one for the SCSI core and upper level drivers, > and one for low-level (hardware) drivers: >=20 > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git core-for-3.16 > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git drivers-for-3.16=20 >=20 > The rules for the tree are: >=20 > - it has at least two positive reviews (non-author signoff, reviewed-by > or acked-by tags). In practice this means it had at least one and > I added another one. > - no negative review on the mailing list > - it applies cleanly > - it compiles cleanly (drivers for architectures I can't test excluded) > - for core the core branch: survives a full xfstests run >=20 > I went through the linux-scsi archives for March, April and May and > applied all patches that clearly fit the above criteria, but it's fairly > like I missed some. >=20 > If I'm missing your patch(es): >=20 > - resend it unless it was sent in the last few weeks > - make sure all reviews are recorded in the most recent post of the > patch(es) > - ping the list for additional reviewers >=20 > For now the prime intent of the tree is to feed it to James, although > I'd welcome everyone interested to pull and test it. If the scheme > proves successful I'd love to invite more core scsi contributors to help > with it and move to a shared kernel.org tree. Is this a request for inclusion of those branches into linux-next separately from the scsi tree itself? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/SA1utnxSaG3OjH0zuGrH_th Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTepvkAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwV3z4P/0lUm5v6aqqR5TFFAGZRXCuW PKn/RKorDYW/Fq0uJDM9n2u1xjPG3l8RFEHzTSDQMr8o+/z6aM0mYbvEHyQ98fYu qy0ov8qh+XsoCEBhyIUZC5IsyP+rOPGP7LCO2yX3Pf+fGhEFTYjgPH0ByUZGD11s SPhniNh8M7j+0DU/AgzSfjfxhLiyWpVDcDckp4HJeZ45gsnI8dy6/87PUmQSOMtH AqJDQ/AHjjy1qBqovLuHzn3atxfAXmteTBtb1MvsT5v6uomDV37AGBfXl2iLOcAF FSXorAU2cnT/0rFdwKW7ydEON5i0k74hRd/59RpnNPj6Q7LZm9KF9LEWNT4d1Uxx 2s5Mwjpw5LdfcgRQRmHA+pfFZUOdk3LJlEI5O2aui2c5T6Vef6cgGFBBUhkHtCkq O57DIg+/aE7X8ShDPDgE5HecZ5f6whtxVh9avl7DUlXRljsI1orMVJeS9lZqkTEW m/TamKUOCULn8CKWrF+l0U71vRzcVUl6Hxenzm13krwIUNbcPp6LGNRtDeitwnvh x55qs862kKnMfVjbqGNVs6hbdDVGlakOtBcEUNpnYN3wXB9LcB8ih7/sNl2KT5OD YZo2sPJI1FudOfw8DxoZDmE29+S0+wMNOJ2o+zftBKme1XiTE9PWNJDJI1VvKD+R kVB99lxnydNWpXhCTpQ/ =EcVt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SA1utnxSaG3OjH0zuGrH_th--