From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: spinlock recursion in migrate_swap_stop
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:05:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140522053540.GA26857@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537CA54A.8030408@oracle.com>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 927fa33..b5e11c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1154,6 +1156,7 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p)
> goto out;
>
> trace_sched_swap_numa(cur, arg.src_cpu, p, arg.dst_cpu);
> + BUG_ON(cur == p);
I am not sure how this check can ever be successful because at the start
of this function migrate_swap() we have
if (arg.src_cpu == arg.dst_cpu)
goto out;
if cur is actually p; then should the above condition should always be
successul right?
Or am I missing something?
> ret = stop_two_cpus(arg.dst_cpu, arg.src_cpu, migrate_swap_stop, &arg);
>
> out:
>
>
> Which seems to get hit. This sounds like a race with task moving to
> other cpu maybe?
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 18:25 Sasha Levin
2014-05-20 2:05 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-20 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-20 13:03 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-21 13:08 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-21 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-21 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-22 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-23 4:03 ` Sasha Levin
2014-05-22 5:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2014-05-22 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140522053540.GA26857@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome