From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752719AbaEZNrZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 09:47:25 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:46277 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbaEZNrW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 09:47:22 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,913,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="545061895" From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Jeff Smith Cc: Paolo Bonzini , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christoph Hellwig , Kenny Simpson , Michal Hocko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: References: <20140519130114.GA3140@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20140519143540.BE9F6E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> <20140519143837.GA5228@infradead.org> <20140526094240.B5508E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> <53834310.8060808@redhat.com> Subject: Re: remap_file_pages() use Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20140526134718.0AAC7E009B@blue.fi.intel.com> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:47:18 +0300 (EEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Smith wrote: > OK, I misinterpreted "the overlapped part of the mapping(s) will be > discarded" as discarding the -new- mappings. My objections about > needing a replacement for remap_file_pages() are gone, but my concerns > about existing code still remain. As I said, emulation will be there for long time. With warning in dmesg. The emulation is interface-compatible, but slower in some cases (not your's). -- Kirill A. Shutemov