From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751922AbaE0HkH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 03:40:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50341 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbaE0HkE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 03:40:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:39:53 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Jean Pihet , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] perf tests: Spawn child for each test Message-ID: <20140527073953.GC12920@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1400174615-2121-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <1400174615-2121-11-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <87lhtohvue.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lhtohvue.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:08:25AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2014 19:23:31 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > In upcoming tests we will setup process limits, which > > might affect other tests. Spawning child for each test > > to prevent this. > > But you can restore original limits after the test using soft limits? > But I think it's better to run the tests in a child anyway. :) right.. I also recalled that Ingo recommended this before, I'll queue this one separately.. thanks, jirka > > Thanks, > Namhyung