Em Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:21:15PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:35:17PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) escreveu:
> > On 05/26/2014 11:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Can you try the attached patch on top of the first one?
>  
> > Patches on patches is a way to make your testers work unnecessarily
> > harder. Also, it means that anyone else who was interested in this
> 
> It was meant to highlight the changes with regard to the previous patch,
> i.e. to make things easier for reviewing.
> 
> > thread likely got lost at this point, because they probably didn't 
> > save the first patch. All of this to say: it makes life much easier 
> > if you provide a complete new self-contained patch on each iteration.
> 
> If you prefer it that way, find one attached, that I was about to send
> (but you can wait till I use your program to test it ;-) )

Really attached this time ;-\

- Arnaldo