From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing: Print nasty banner when trace_printk() is in use
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:22:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528172239.GX30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140528131440.2283213c@gandalf.local.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:14:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> trace_printk() is used to debug fast paths within the kernel. Places
> that gets called in any context (interrupt or NMI) or thousands of
> times a second. Something you do not want to do with a printk().
>
> In order to make it completely lockless as it needs a temporary buffer
> to handle some of the string formatting, a page is created per cpu for
> every context (four per cpu; normal, softirq, irq, NMI).
>
> Since trace_printk() should only be used for debugging purposes,
> there's no reason to waste memory on these buffers on a production
> system. That means, trace_printk() should never be used unless a
> developer is debugging their kernel. There's macro magic to allocate
> the buffers if trace_printk() is used anywhere in the kernel.
>
> To help enforce that trace_printk() isn't used outside of development,
> when it is used, a nasty banner is displayed on bootup (or when a module
> is loaded that uses trace_printk() and the kernel core does not).
>
> Here's the banner:
>
> ****************************************
> ** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
> ** trace_printk() being used. **
> ** Allocating extra memory for it **
> ****************************************
>
> Hmm, maybe I should add "Not for production use" to scare people even
> more?
Does that really stop people from doing stupid? Wouldn't it be better to
make sure nobody merges a trace_printk() user in mainline? You can set
up a commit hook and check for +.*trace_printk or so.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 17:14 Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-05-28 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-28 17:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-28 17:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-30 6:07 ` Olaf Titz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528172239.GX30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®