From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v4)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:40:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529154033.f8d159b909794d71e2754489@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529184303.GA20571@amt.cnet>
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:43:03 -0300 Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Zone specific allocations, such as GFP_DMA32, should not be restricted
> to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand
> might be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list.
>
> Necessary for the following usecase:
> - driver which requires zone specific memory (such as KVM, which
> requires root pagetable at paddr < 4GB).
> - user wants to limit allocations of application to nodeX, and nodeX has
> no memory < 4GB.
>
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2392,6 +2393,10 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
> if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
> return 1;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
> + return 1;
> +#endif
It's not very obvious why this code is doing what it does, so I'm
thinking a comment is needed. And that changelog text looks good, so
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c~page_alloc-skip-cpuset-enforcement-for-lower-zone-allocations-v4-fix
+++ a/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2388,6 +2388,11 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int n
if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
return 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ /*
+ * Zone specific allocations such as GFP_DMA32 should not be restricted
+ * to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations
+ * demand be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list
+ */
if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
return 1;
#endif
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~page_alloc-skip-cpuset-enforcement-for-lower-zone-allocations-v4-fix
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2742,6 +2742,11 @@ retry_cpuset:
cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ /*
+ * Zone specific allocations such as GFP_DMA32 should not be restricted
+ * to cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations
+ * demand be contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list
+ */
if (gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone)
nodemask = &node_states[N_ONLINE];
#endif
However perhaps it would be nicer to do
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
* Zone specific allocations such as GFP_DMA32 should not be restricted to
* cpusets allowed node list: the zones which such allocations demand be
* contained in particular nodes outside the cpuset node list
*/
static inline bool i_cant_think_of_a_name(gfp_t mask)
{
return gfp_zone(gfp_mask) < policy_zone;
}
#else
static inline bool i_cant_think_of_a_name(gfp_t mask)
{
return false;
}
#endif
This encapsulates it all in a single place and zaps those ifdefs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 19:37 [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-23 20:51 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-23 23:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-26 18:53 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-28 7:02 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-28 22:43 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-28 23:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-29 18:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 18:43 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 22:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-05-29 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-29 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-30 13:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 21:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 23:28 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations (v5) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-29 23:54 ` David Rientjes
2014-05-30 13:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-30 13:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-05-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2014-05-27 14:21 ` [PATCH] page_alloc: skip cpuset enforcement for lower zone allocations Christoph Lameter
2014-05-27 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 14:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-05-27 15:31 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140529154033.f8d159b909794d71e2754489@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®