From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Subject: [patch v2 3/5] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 15:57:50 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140531155739.340193331@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140531155229.493650009@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: rtmutex-confine-deadlock-logic-to-futex.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8837 bytes --]
The builtin tester is gone,, so the deadlock logic is now only
required for futexes.
Remove the extra arguments for the public functions and also for the
futex specific ones which get always called with deadlock detection
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031950.044848781@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 6 +--
kernel/futex.c | 9 +----
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 7 +---
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Index: tip/include/linux/rtmutex.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ tip/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -90,11 +90,9 @@ extern void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mu
extern void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-extern int rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- int detect_deadlock);
+extern int rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern int rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout);
extern int rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
Index: tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1619,8 +1619,7 @@ retry_private:
this->pi_state = pi_state;
ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
this->rt_waiter,
- this->task,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ this->task);
if (ret == 1) {
/* We got the lock. */
requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
@@ -2240,8 +2239,7 @@ retry_private:
* Block on the PI mutex:
*/
if (!trylock) {
- ret = rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_timed_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to);
} else {
ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
@@ -2564,8 +2562,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
*/
WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
- ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -904,16 +904,15 @@ rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *loc
*/
static inline int
rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
- enum rtmutex_chainwalk detect_deadlock,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk detect_deadlock))
{
- if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+ if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
- return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, detect_deadlock);
+ return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
}
static inline int
@@ -924,7 +923,7 @@ rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk detect_deadlock))
{
- if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+ if (detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
@@ -961,55 +960,59 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mut
{
might_sleep();
- rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
- rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
/**
* rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
*
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
- * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
*
* Returns:
- * 0 on success
- * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
- * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
+ * 0 on success
+ * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
*/
-int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- enum rtmutex_chainwalk detect_deadlock)
+int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
might_sleep();
- return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
- detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+/*
+ * Futex variant to allow full deadlock detection.
+ */
+int __rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+
+ return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
+ rt_mutex_slowlock);
+}
+
/**
* rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
* the timeout structure is provided
* by the caller
*
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
* @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout)
- * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
*
* Returns:
- * 0 on success
- * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
+ * 0 on success
+ * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
* -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired
- * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
*/
int
-rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
- int detect_deadlock)
+rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
- might_sleep();
-
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
- detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
+ RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
+ rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
@@ -1115,7 +1118,6 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mut
* @lock: the rt_mutex to take
* @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
* @task: the task to prepare
- * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
*
* Returns:
* 0 - task blocked on lock
@@ -1126,7 +1128,7 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mut
*/
int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task, int detect_deadlock)
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
int ret;
@@ -1137,7 +1139,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
return 1;
}
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
@@ -1183,9 +1186,8 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(
* rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition
* @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
* @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
- * been started.
+ * been started.
* @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
*
* Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread.
*
@@ -1197,8 +1199,7 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(
*/
int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- int detect_deadlock)
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
int ret;
Index: tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ tip/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -104,12 +104,11 @@ extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct
struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct task_struct *task);
extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- int detect_deadlock);
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+extern int __rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
# include "rtmutex-debug.h"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-31 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-31 15:57 [patch v2 0/5] rtmutex: Code clarification and optimization Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 15:57 ` [patch v2 1/5] rtmutex: Remove builtin tester Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-31 15:57 ` [patch v2 2/5] rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-04 13:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-04 19:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-04 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-05-31 19:54 ` [patch v2 3/5] rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futex Steven Rostedt
2014-05-31 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 15:57 ` [patch v2 4/5] rtmutex: Clarify the lock chain walk Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-31 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-31 15:57 ` [patch v2 5/5] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection " Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-02 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140531155739.340193331@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®